Idea
SaaS Idea → MVP Planner
“I have the idea. Where do I start?”
Give it your idea, your target customer, their problem and your proposed solution.
- Core problem
- Customer
- MVP definition
- Features
- User journey
- Development priorities
- Launch roadmap
For non-technical founders who have the idea, not the plan
Turn your SaaS idea into a 30-day MVP build plan using AI — without learning to code
The SaaS MVP Launch OS is a set of 10 custom GPTs and Claude Skills that help you validate, scope, plan and document your MVP — and hand a developer something they can actually build from.
Get lifetime access for $3
One-time payment · No subscription · No coding required
- 1Product definition
- 2Product definition
- 3Product definition
- 4Architecture + design
- 5Architecture + design
- 6Architecture + design
- 7Architecture + design
- 8Core development
- 9Core development
- 10Core development
- 11Core development
- 12Core development
- 13Core development
- 14Core development
- 15Core development
- 16Core development
- 17Core development
- 18Core development
- 19Core development
- 20Core development
- 21Core development
- 22Core development
- 23Core development
- 24Core development
- 25Core development
- 26QA
- 27QA
- 28QA
- 29Deployment + launch
- 30Deployment + launch
If you're stuck on any of these, this was built for you
- What exactly should I build?
- Can this actually be built in 30 days?
- Which features should I include?
- What should I tell my developer?
- What technology do I need?
- How do I avoid wasting months and money?
Built by folks who built
Prior employers of the engineers who catalogued the patterns inside MVP-OS. All names are the trademarks of their respective owners; no endorsement or affiliation is implied.
The problem
Your SaaS idea isn't the problem.
Uncertainty is.
You have the vision. You know the customer problem. You may even have a list of 30–50 features. Then reality hits, and there are eight things you can't answer.
- Which features belong in the MVP
- Which features should wait
- Whether your scope is realistic
- What will make development expensive
- What technology you actually need
- How to explain your idea to developers
- What your critical user journey should be
- What needs to be tested before launch
So you keep planning.
You keep researching.
You keep talking to developers.
And your 30-day MVP quietly becomes a 3-month, 6-month, or never-launched MVP.
What changes
Say “here's my SaaS idea” once.
Get answers to the seven questions that matter.
- Can I build it?
- Feasibility
- What should I build?
- MVP scope
- What should I cut?
- Feature prioritisation
- How should the user experience it?
- User journey
- How should it be built?
- Technical direction
- How do I explain it to developers?
- Developer-ready brief
- How do I prepare for launch?
- QA + launch planning
What's inside
Ten tools, one per stage of getting build-ready
Not another 100-page ebook. Each tool takes what you already know about your product and turns it into a document you can act on.
Customer
SaaS User Journey Architect
“What should my user actually do inside my product?”
Map the path a user takes from first click to coming back.
- Signup
- Onboarding
- First value
- Core action
- Result
- Retention
Validate
30-Day MVP Feasibility Auditor
“Can my SaaS realistically be built in 30 days?”
Feed it your idea and current scope to surface what threatens the timeline.
- Scope risks
- Technical dependencies
- Complexity
- Potential bottlenecks
- Critical development paths
You get 30-Day MVP Feasibility Assessment
Scope
MVP Scope Surgeon
“What should I actually build?”
Give it your feature list and it sorts every item into three buckets.
- Build now
- Build later
- Don't build yet
The fastest MVP is not the one with the most features. It is the one with the right features.
Simplify
Feature-Creep Destroyer
“Which features are secretly killing my launch?”
Paste your feature list and find what to remove.
- Unnecessary features
- Duplicate functionality
- Premature automation
- Complexity traps
- Secondary features
- Things that can wait
Tech
Non-Technical CTO
“What technology should I use?”
Weigh the stack decisions in founder-friendly language, not engineering jargon.
- Frontend
- Backend
- Database
- Authentication
- Payments
- APIs
- AI integrations
- Hosting
- Analytics
Complexity
SaaS MVP Complexity Auditor
“What's actually going to make this expensive?”
Analyse the proposed MVP before development starts, while changes are still cheap.
- Complexity drivers
- Technical dependencies
- Integration risks
- Potential scope inflation
- Simplification opportunities
Document
Founder → Developer Brief Builder
“How do I explain my idea to a developer?”
Turn your thinking into a specification a developer can quote against.
- Product overview
- User stories
- User flows
- Feature requirements
- Acceptance criteria
- Edge cases
- MVP boundaries
Instead of “I want something like Uber but for X”, you hand over a clear spec.
Test
SaaS MVP QA Commander
“How do I know my MVP is ready to launch?”
Build a QA plan you can run yourself, in plain language.
- Signup
- Login
- Core workflows
- Payments
- Integrations
- Error states
- Edge cases
Finding critical problems after launch is an expensive way to do QA.
Launch
30-Day SaaS Launch Planner
“What should happen first?”
Turn your MVP scope into a day-by-day roadmap you can actually work through.
- Days 1–3Product definition
- Days 4–7Architecture + design
- Days 8–25Core development
- Days 26–28QA
- Days 29–30Deployment + launch
The order you run them in
From idea to build-ready, in ten steps
- 01Enter your SaaS idea
- 02Run the Feasibility Auditor
- 03Cut your scope with the Scope Surgeon
- 04Prioritise your features
- 05Map your user journey
- 06Create your technical direction
- 07Generate your developer brief
- 08Build your QA checklist
- 09Create your 30-day roadmap
- 10Build and launch
The real transformation
What you stop saying, and what you say instead
Before
- I have a SaaS idea.
- I don't know what to build.
- I don't know what technology I need.
- I don't know what to tell developers.
- I don't know if this can launch in 30 days.
After
- I know my core customer.
- I know my critical user journey.
- I know what belongs in my MVP.
- I know what to cut.
- I understand the technical direction.
- I have a developer-ready brief.
- I have a 30-day execution roadmap.
What the $3 leaves you holding
Six documents a developer can actually build from
- 01Product Deep-Dive & Full Feature Inventory
- 02MVP Scope Surgery — build-now / build-later / never, with reasoning
- 03The MVP Blueprint — screen-by-screen, user journey, data model, acceptance criteria
- 04Technical Architecture Document — stack, hosting, auth, payments, integrations, running-cost envelope
- 05Claude Development Skill Package — custom Claude skills scoped to your product
- 06The 30-Day Launch Plan — day-by-day roadmap with milestone gates
One $3 payment, lifetime access, and every document it produces is yours. Take the blueprint to another development shop, hand it to a freelancer, or build from it yourself — all three are fine outcomes, and none of them cost you anything more.
Get instant access
Everything in the toolkit, for the price of a coffee you'd forget
The goal isn't to make this expensive. It's to put the tools in the hands of founders who actually want to build something.
- 10 plug-and-play AI tools
- MVP scope frameworks
- Developer brief system
- 30-day feasibility framework
- MVP QA framework
- 30-day launch planning system
- Lifetime access
SaaS MVP Launch OS
10 plug-and-play AI tools for non-technical SaaS founders
$3one time
Yes — get my MVP OS- Lifetime access
- No subscription
- No coding required
- Use it on your own idea
A planning toolkit, not a development service. It helps you decide what to build — it doesn't build it for you.
Who it's for
Worth $3 to some founders. Worth nothing to others.
This is for you if
- You have a SaaS idea
- You're not technical
- You don't know what your MVP should contain
- You're worried about wasting money on developers
- You want to launch quickly
- You're overwhelmed by technical decisions
- You want a clear development plan
Skip it if
- You already have a complete technical team
- You enjoy spending months researching frameworks
- You want someone else to invent your business idea
- You expect AI to replace actual development work
- You want a guaranteed 30-day launch regardless of complexity
The tools help you plan, scope, diagnose and prepare. They don't eliminate the work of building real software.
And one more thing
Planning is one problem. Someone still has to build it.
Once you have your scope, requirements, user journey, technical direction and roadmap, the planning problem is solved. The next one is obvious.
You focus on
- Customers
- Validation
- Sales
- Business
We handle
- Product development
- Engineering
- Integrations
- QA and deployment
If you eventually want someone to actually build the software, that's our end-to-end SaaS MVP development service. The toolkit isn't competing with it — it's the bridge to it.
The sequence
How the 27 build days run
$3,500Days 4–30 · The build sprint
Days 1–3 of the 30 are the blueprint — the part the $3 toolkit does for you, on your own time. What follows is the 27 days we spend building against it. Every milestone is a gate: this is what you can see and click at each one.
| When | Milestone | Gate — what you see |
|---|---|---|
| Days 4–7 | Foundations | Clickable UI you can open |
| Days 8–14 | Core loop | A working core feature |
| Days 15–21 | Full scope + QA pass one | Staging environment, full walkthrough |
| Days 22–26 | Hardening & launch prep | Sign-off checklist against every acceptance criterion |
| Day 27 | Go live | Your MVP, live |
| Days 28–30 | Handover & training | Full handover pack, support month begins |
The team
Who builds it
| Role | What they own |
|---|---|
| Forward-Deployed Engineers | Build the product against the blueprint. Deployed to your project, not shared across ten accounts. |
| UI/UX Expert | Screens, flows, states and a small design system. |
| Quality Analyst | Tests every acceptance criterion before anything is called done. |
| Operations Manager | Environments, deployment, domain, monitoring, backups. |
| Delivery Manager | Owns the date. Single point of contact. This is the role most agencies do not have. |
| MVP-OS Engine | Our internal system, orchestrating scope, brief generation, code generation, QA plans and the roadmap. |
Who is actually doing this work
You are being asked to hand your product to a team you found on the internet. So before the pricing, here is who is on the other side of it.
Gaurav D. Sharma
CTO, Divam Technologies · Co-founder & CTO of a fintech SaaS
Fifteen-plus years building product across SaaS, fintech and mobile, and a bit over twenty stacks shipped to production. Seven and a half years of that on a loyalty and ordering SaaS platform powering thousands of restaurants across the United States — most of a career shipping software for American customers, on American expectations, in American time zones. He is a founder talking to founders, not an agency owner talking to leads.
- 1st rankCTO Certification, IIT Kanpur (2025–26)
- 15+ yearsBuilding product across SaaS, fintech, mobile
- 20+ stacksShipped to production, end to end
- AWS SASolutions Architect, Associate · AI Summit speaker
The architects behind the engine
The patterns inside MVP-OS were catalogued by engineers whose careers span Intel, Samsung, Nokia Siemens, Wipro, Naukri, Monster, CareerBuilder, HackerRank, Freshworks, Netcore and Punchh. Between them: enterprise silicon, telecom infrastructure, the largest recruitment platforms in India and the US, developer assessment at scale, and customer-engagement SaaS used by thousands of businesses. Your build lead has twelve-plus years building AI products at scale and is currently co-founder of an AI startup.
That combination is the point: enterprise-scale engineering discipline, applied to a 30-day build.
Inside the engine
Why 30 days is a real number
“30-day MVP” is usually a marketing claim. Ours is structural, and the reason is the engine. MVP-OS is not a prompt library and it is not one model doing everything. It is a hybrid system: a very large pattern library, models fine-tuned against our own design system, and a routing layer that sends each kind of work to the model that measurably wins at it.
- 1,000sof architecture and design patterns, production-proven
- 5specialised model routes, one per class of work
- 1coherent architecture out the other end
Thousands of architecture patterns, not a blank page
MVP-OS is built on thousands of architecture and design patterns catalogued by our technical architects across enterprise silicon, telecom, high-scale recruitment platforms and customer-engagement SaaS. Auth models, billing flows, notification systems, multi-tenant data layers, queueing, caching, role hierarchies, audit trails — each one already exists in the library in several variants, with the trade-offs written down. When your product needs one, we are not inventing it on the spot and we are not letting a model improvise it. We select the pattern that has already survived production at scale, and adapt it to you.
This is where most of the 27 days is actually saved. A team starting from a blank page spends its first week making decisions that were already made correctly somewhere else.
Models fine-tuned to our design system
An off-the-shelf model produces plausible code that drifts in style from file to file — eleven different opinions stitched together, none of them wrong on their own, unmaintainable as a whole. We fine-tune against our own design-system corpus so the output is coherent with one architecture. That is the difference between a demo and something your next engineer can pick up and extend without a rewrite.
A hybrid routing layer — the right model for the right job
Most teams pick one model and use it for everything, then blame the model when the output is uneven. Different models are genuinely better at different classes of work, and the gap is large enough to matter over 27 days. So we route each task to the one that wins at it, and for the highest-judgement work we run several and cross-check them against each other:
| Task | Model we route it to |
|---|---|
| Frontend & design patterns | Gemini — strongest on layout, component structure and design-system adherence |
| Backend logic & architecture | Claude — best reasoning over system design, data models and edge cases |
| Unit test generation | Claude Opus — highest coverage, fewest useless assertions |
| Feature & integration tests | OpenAI Codex — strongest at reasoning across a whole user flow |
| Product thinking & scope calls | An ensemble of several models — cross-checked, then decided by a human |
A human accountability layer
The engine does the volume. It does not carry the risk. Forward-deployed engineers own the architecture and review every line, a quality analyst tests against written acceptance criteria, and a named human signs off before anything reaches production. Nothing ships because a model said it was fine.
Pattern library, fine-tuning and hybrid routing together are why the same 27 days produces a product rather than a prototype — and why this costs $3,500 instead of $10,000.
Risk
Four guarantees, so the risk sits with us
The Blueprint Guarantee
The blueprint, the architecture and the Claude skill package cost $3, once. No subscription, no card kept on file, nothing to cancel. If you never come back for the build, you keep all of it and owe nothing further — the toolkit is a complete product on its own, not a trial.
The 30-Day Launch Guarantee
Your MVP is live within 30 calendar days of build kickoff, or we keep building at zero additional cost until it is live and the final $1,750 is waived entirely.
Conditions: scope stays locked to the blueprint you signed off; your approvals come back within one business day; and delays caused by third parties outside our control (app store review, your payment processor’s KYC, an API vendor of yours) pause the clock for exactly as long as they last.
The Delayed Payment Guarantee
You pay $1,750 to start and the second $1,750 only after your MVP is live and you have signed off. If it never goes live, we never collect the second half.
The Keep-Everything Clause
Whatever happens, everything produced is yours: the blueprint, the architecture, the Claude skill package, the repository, the designs, the credentials. This is in the contract, not just on this page.
Pricing
What the build costs
| When | Amount | Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| The toolkit | $3 | Paid once, at checkout. The only thing this site charges for. |
| Build kickoff | $1,750 | On signed blueprint sign-off, before development begins. |
| Final | $1,750 | After your MVP is live and you have signed off. Waived in full if we miss the 30-day guarantee. |
$3,500$10,000Typical agency cost for this scope
$3,500 total for the build, quoted and invoiced separately. USD, by bank transfer or card. The $3 toolkit is the only thing you pay before it starts.
After launch
The month after launch is included
A full month of technical support after launch. Defects in the delivered scope fixed free, with a one-business-day response on anything blocking a user. Small changes — copy, labels, styling, configuration, behaviour tweaks — done free. Technical help when you or a new hire get stuck, free. Plus a structured knowledge transfer and training session.
New feature development and extensions to existing features are quoted separately; everything else in that month is on us.
Want us to build it instead?
There is nothing to buy here. Start with the $3 toolkit either way — it is what the build runs on — and when you have the blueprint, tell us what you are building.
hi@newtononmars.com · +91 83022 00665
Worst case, you spend $3 and an afternoon, and walk away with a professional technical blueprint for your product.
Best case, you are live in 30 days, still own all of your company, and you are talking to your first customer a month from now.
Questions
Straight answers
MVP-OS — the $3 toolkit
Do I need to know how to code?
No. The toolkit is built around the needs of non-technical founders. You provide the product context; the tools help you work through the product and development-planning decisions.
Is this a SaaS development service?
No. This is an AI-powered planning toolkit. If you want us to build the MVP, that is a separate service.
Do I need ChatGPT and Claude?
Access requirements are listed on the checkout page, based on how the GPTs and Skills are delivered to you.
Is the $3 a subscription?
No. It is a one-time $3 payment for lifetime access to the bundle.
Will this guarantee my MVP launches in 30 days?
No. The tools help you assess feasibility and build a 30-day-oriented plan. Actual development time depends on scope, complexity, integrations and team capacity.
What happens after I buy?
You get access to the toolkit straight away and can start with your own SaaS idea immediately.
If I want you to build it, what does that cost?
$3,500 for the 27-Day Build Sprint, quoted on enquiry — half at kickoff, half only after your MVP is live. It is a separate service and it is not sold from this page; the section further down covers the timeline, the team and the guarantees.
See how the build works →Does buying the toolkit count towards the build?
The blueprint it produces is exactly what the build runs on, so yes — if you come to us afterwards we start from the plan you have already built instead of a blank page. The $3 is the only thing you pay before a build is quoted.
The 27-Day Build Sprint — the $3,500 service
Do I have to buy the build?
No, and there is no way to buy it on this site. The $3 toolkit is a complete product on its own: it produces the blueprint, the technical architecture and the Claude skill package, and you can take those to any developer or build from them yourself. The build sprint exists for founders who would rather not.
Why not just find a technical co-founder?
For a company you intend to run for ten years, you probably should. But you do not need to pay for version one in equity. A technical co-founder joining pre-product typically costs 20–40% of the company. This costs $3,500 and takes 30 days. Get the MVP live, get evidence of demand, then recruit a CTO from a position of strength.
Is 30 days real, or a marketing number?
It is real because of the blueprint you arrive with, not because anyone works faster than physics. Locked scope, written acceptance criteria and a delivery manager who owns the date are what make it achievable — and it is backed by the guarantee above.
Is this just AI writing the code?
No. The engine routes each task to the model that wins at it and draws on a library of production-proven patterns. That is why this costs $3,500 instead of $35,000. But forward-deployed engineers architect and review every line, a quality analyst tests it against written criteria, and a human signs off before anything reaches production.
Who owns the code?
You do, completely, from the first commit — the repository is created on your account, not ours. Written IP assignment is included.
What do you need from me during the build?
Approvals within one business day, and access to any third-party accounts your product needs. Realistically two to three hours a week.
What if my idea turns out to be bigger than 27 days?
We say so before we quote, and quote it properly instead. The toolkit will usually tell you the same thing first — that is what the feasibility auditor is for. We would rather lose the engagement than sell a date we cannot hit.
Idea → Feasibility → Scope → User journey → Tech → Developer brief → QA → Launch plan
Your SaaS doesn't need another 50-page guide. It needs a clear path.
Stop wondering what to build. Start getting your MVP ready to build.
Yes — let's get my MVP readyLifetime access · $3 one time